home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=92TT0591>
- <title>
- Mar. 16, 1992: We Are Ignoring Our World Role
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
- Mar. 16, 1992 Jay Leno
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ESSAY, Page 74
- We Are Ignoring Our World Role
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Richard Nixon
- </p>
- <p> Foreign policy is the great forgotten issue in this
- year's campaign. Over the past 44 years, I have closely observed
- 12 presidential campaigns and participated as a candidate in
- five. Never has there been less discussion of foreign policy
- than in this campaign. Yet never has it been a more important
- issue than today.
- </p>
- <p> Republicans, who have been strong on the issue, believe
- the American people no longer care about it. Democrats, who
- have been weak on the issue, are afraid to raise it. Both are
- making a grave mistake. In 1956 President Dwight Eisenhower ran
- on the slogan of "Peace and Prosperity." Today both goals
- totally depend on whether we adopt a new American
- internationalism.
- </p>
- <p> Domestic and foreign policy are like Siamese twins--neither can survive without the other. The United States cannot
- be at peace in a world of wars, as Iraq's aggression against
- Kuwait demonstrated. Nor can we have a healthy domestic economy
- in a sick world economy. Those who accuse President George Bush
- of focusing excessively on events abroad fail to see that
- domestic and foreign policy are not in conflict but rather can
- only succeed by moving in tandem.
- </p>
- <p> Nowhere is this more true than in the two crucial issues
- of protectionism and assistance for Russia.
- </p>
- <p> More than ever, trade is the key to prosperity. The
- recession of 1931 became the Great Depression of 1932 after the
- Smoot-Hawley tariffs contributed to the collapse of world
- markets. Since trade accounts for 25% of U.S. GNP today, a trade
- war would trigger a depression that would make the present
- downturn look like a minor blip.
- </p>
- <p> Those who bash Japan are running down America. Their hand
- wringing and defeatist attitude assumes that the United States
- is a pitiful, helpless giant that can only survive behind new
- trade barriers. The path to prosperity in the next century lies
- not in building protectionist walls for ourselves but in
- breaching those erected by others.
- </p>
- <p> America does not need to retreat from international
- competition. Instead we need government and business to
- cooperate toward capturing new foreign markets. It is time to
- create an Economic Security Council to formulate a comprehensive
- international economic strategy, just as the National Security
- Council coordinates our security policies.
- </p>
- <p> Peace and U.S. security are inextricably linked to the
- fate of Russia's political and economic reforms. After the Duke
- of Wellington defeated Napoleon at Waterloo in 1815, he
- described the battle as "the nearest run thing you ever saw in
- your life." Today President Boris Yeltsin has launched a radical
- program of economic reforms. Its fate will at best be a near run
- thing. Just as Wellington's victory determined the course of
- European history for the 19th century, the outcome of Yeltsin's
- bold gamble will decisively affect the history of the 21st
- century.
- </p>
- <p> If Yeltsin succeeds, a democratic Russia will integrate
- itself into the West. It will bolster European stability,
- cooperate with Western powers in far-flung crises and enhance
- prosperity through trade. If he fails, a new despotism will
- arise based on extremist Russian nationalism. This could trigger
- war among the former Soviet republics, force the West to rearm,
- threaten Eastern Europe's security, relieve pressures in China
- for political reform and lead to sales of Russian arms and
- military technology to rogue states such as Iraq, Syria, Iran,
- Libya and North Korea.
- </p>
- <p> A new Russian despotism inspired by a vital imperial
- nationalism and shorn of the baggage of the dying faith of
- communism could potentially be even more dangerous than the old
- Soviet totalitarianism.
- </p>
- <p> We are at a watershed moment for America's world role. In
- the cold war, we played a dramatic but defensive role in
- containing communism. In the immediate postwar years, we
- implemented a two-pronged strategy to blunt Moscow's main thrust
- in Europe, using military power to deter aggression and economic
- power through the Marshall Plan to counter the communist
- ideological challenge. We later beat back Soviet salients in
- Korea, the Philippines, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Angola,
- Afghanistan and elsewhere.
- </p>
- <p> This bought us time. And all we needed was time to allow
- the ideas of communism to fail. Radio Free Europe and other
- Western policies contributed to the erosion of faith in
- communism. But it was the ideology's fundamental flaws that
- doomed it to inevitable defeat.
- </p>
- <p> In the cold war, we helped avoid great evils. But now we
- have the chance to advance great goods. While the communists
- have lost, we have not won until we prove that the ideas of
- freedom can provide the peoples of the former Soviet Union with
- a better life. We must enlist the same spirit that won the
- defensive battle against communism to win the offensive battle
- to ensure the victory of freedom. We must mobilize the West to
- commit the billions of dollars needed to give Russia's reforms
- a fighting chance to succeed.
- </p>
- <p> An unholy alliance of the left and right stands in the
- way. Some Democrats, turning away from the internationalist
- tradition of Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt and Harry
- Truman, argue that the United States is too poor and too
- unworthy to play a major world role. Some Republicans,
- abandoning the tradition of enlightened foreign policy
- stretching from Eisenhower through Bush, call for a new
- isolationism. Both fail to see the iron link between the U.S.
- leadership and our twin goals of peace abroad and prosperity at
- home.
- </p>
- <p> Political gurus on both sides are advising candidates that
- activism in foreign policy is a political loser. But a great
- candidate does not follow the polls; he makes them follow him.
- The true mark of leadership is not simply to support what is
- popular but to make what is unpopular popular, if that serves
- our national interest.
- </p>
- <p> Public opinion responds to threats, not to opportunities.
- It is easy to mobilize support to meet a clear threat but
- difficult to rally it to seize a fleeting opportunity. If our
- leaders put foreign policy on the back burner until world events
- produce a new threat, our moment of opportunity will have
- vanished.
- </p>
- <p> In writing about the 19th century British Prime Minister
- Lord Rosebery, Winston Churchill observed that he had the
- misfortune of living in "an age of great men and small events."
- Today our leaders have the good fortune to live in a time of
- great events. Their challenge is to rise to the level of those
- events.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-